KANSAS CITY, Mo. — In “Lincoln,” director
Steven Spielberg lasers in on 1865: The end of the Civil War. The end of
slavery via the 13th Amendment. And, devastatingly, the end of
President Abraham Lincoln. A powerful, momentous year in American
history.
And so long ago. Or was it? Juanita Tudor Lowrey has something to say about that: “My father fought in the Civil War.”
It’s a line that makes people’s faces squinch. Your father? A contemporary of Lincoln?
Millions of moviegoers are flocking to see Daniel
Day-Lewis disappear into his role as the 16th president, the film’s
setting a world away from the re-election in November of our 44th
president, an African-American.
But the chasm seems not so wide to Lowrey. On a
recent afternoon she spread out paperwork, photographs and two small
diaries with black covers on her kitchen table. Lowrey pointed out a
diary entry dated March 23, 1865:
“This morning Genl. Sherman and his the 14th Corps
came in. ... We fell in and saluted him respectfully. It is very windy.
We drawed rations. The(y) fired 15 guns to salute Sherman.”
The words are those of Lowrey’s father, Hugh Tudor,
an infantry private in the Union army from early 1864 through the summer
of 1865.
Tudor moved with his unit through Kentucky,
Tennessee, to the East Coast. He probably would have participated in
Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman’s march to the sea except that an apparent
case of the measles kept him back.
Born in Iowa in 1847, the son of Welsh immigrants
lived in Missouri most of his life. That he has a daughter proudly
talking about him in the year 2012 is a remarkable mathematical stretch,
but not a stretch of the truth.
After the war, Lowrey’s father settled in Dawn, Mo.,
a farming community south of Chillicothe, with his wife, Elizabeth
Watkins. They had been married 50 years when she died in 1917. They had
no children.
Three years later, at age 73, Tudor married
36-year-old Mary Morgan, who hadn’t been married before but who had
known “Mr. Tudor” her whole life.
Besides romance, Lowrey says, probably there
were practical concerns. He likely needed a housekeeper and she
security. And it seemed he still fancied having children.
Indeed, to the new union came two daughters, HuDean Grace in 1924 and Juanita Mary in 1926.
There the four are in a photo on their farm property
— “That’s the chicken house in the background, not our house,” Lowrey
says — Tudor looking grandfatherly with a white beard and head of white
hair.
Two years later in 1928, the family traveled to
Denver for the national encampment of the Grand Army of the Republic, a
fraternal organization of Civil War veterans.
Tudor and his young family caught the attention of
the Denver Morning Post. The paper displayed their picture on the front
page, the elderly father, seated with his two little girls perched on
the arms of the chair, their mother standing next to them.
The article paraphrased Tudor that “rearing a family
gets more interesting as one grows older.” It noted Mary’s comment that
she had been a friend of the first Mrs. Tudor. And it quoted her on the
topic of her husband’s age:
“No, he isn’t able to do much work now,” she
explains. “But he has enough laid by that he doesn’t have to work, and
we get along fine. He spends lots of time playing with the children and
is quite fond of them.”
Hugh Tudor died later that year. Lowrey, just 2
years old at the time, has no memory of him. But she is the keeper of
his diaries from his early years, as well as tintype photographs and
newspaper clippings. Lowrey’s sister, HuDean, died in April.
One of Lowrey’s three children, Margie
Yansura, who lives in Florida, says it was easy to become a Civil War
buff with such a legacy.
“It’s a fantastic glimpse into history,” she says
of the journals, “ as expressed by a very young, 16- and 17-year-old
caught up in this huge national conflict.”
Like many young men at the time, Tudor was eager to
join the war effort and enlisted early at 16. He wrote “18” on a piece
of paper and put it in his shoe, so he could truthfully say he was “over
18.”
His diary entries describe the weather, the lay of
the land — he probably hadn’t traveled much beyond his home in Iowa —
and crops, which is what he knew coming from a farm.
He could read and write but wasn’t the best speller.
The Army provided a quick introduction to the ways of the world. One
entry mentions a “horehouse.”
Geography? At one point he talks about the Pacific Ocean when he probably was looking at some eastern bay.
Two days before the entry about Sherman, he writes:
“We started of(f) again on march at 6 o’clock a.m. and crossed 2 creeks
and through some good countery ... We got into Goldsburow (Goldsboro,
N.C.) at 4 o’clock.”
Tudor didn’t experience major fighting. He wrote
letters for other soldiers, probably to make extra money, and did a lot
of trading of knives, trinkets and food. He sent gifts and cards home to
his sisters.
“I’m sure he was taught as a farm boy to be thrifty and to make the most of a situation,” Yansura says.
In Dawn following the war, Tudor was a farmer and
businessman — insurance, home loans, lightning rod sales. He founded the
cemetery there for the predominantly Welsh community.
Lowrey was interviewed in the early 2000s
for the BBC documentary series, “Star Spangled Dragon,” about the Welsh
in America. She told of her father’s experience in the Civil War, how he
was among the troops reviewed by Sherman at the end of the war.
“That was the only time I teared up,” Lowrey says. “I felt very proud that he was there.”
As for Lowrey, who folks have called Skeet
since she was in the first grade, she graduated from Chillicothe
Business College and at age 21 used money her mother had put aside from
Tudor’s Army pension for a down payment on a house. She worked in Kansas
City at a World War II battery factory and other businesses, including
Skelly Oil and Emery, Bird, Thayer.
A few years after Lowrey married Tom DeFord,
the couple moved to Michigan and raised their children. They retired to
Arkansas, and DeFord died in 1992.
Like father, like daughter. In 1996, at age 70, she
married Russell Lowrey, someone she had gone through school with in
Dawn. They recently moved from Gladstone to a retirement community in
Kearney.
So how many others are there like Lowrey, now 86, actual sons and daughters of Civil War veterans? Not many.
Several organizations try to keep track of the
surviving “real” sons and daughters of Civil War veterans — children,
not just descendants — including the Daughters of Union Veterans of the
Civil War, Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War, Sons of Confederate
Veterans and United Daughters of the Confederacy.
The situations in these families were similar, says
David Demmy of the Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War, vets in
their 70s and 80s having late-in-life children. People who hear about
children of Civil War vets are invariably skeptical until you put pencil
to paper for them, he says.
“You can see the gears running in their heads,” he says. “They’re trying to calculate, can that be possible?”
Tallying these groups’ current lists, the total is
about 60. And even figuring that all the real sons and daughters haven’t
been identified, the number of Civil War children is likely less than
100, says Ben Sewell of the Sons of Confederate Veterans.
Sarah Anderson of the Daughters of Union Veterans of
the Civil War knows of 10 surviving Union vet daughters. “There’s no
one closer to the Civil War. The way I look at it, they’re a national
treasure.”
Lowrey doesn’t know about “national treasure,” but she appreciates her unusual heritage: “It’s special.”
No comments:
Post a Comment